Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Another Predator

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    11
    204
    14.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NexxCatundefined
      NexxCat @Carlo
      last edited by

      @Carlo
      Try using this macro to configure your Z-probe offset. I wrote it and use it across multiple machines. Make sure to heat both the bed and nozzle. I use 60C on the bed and 130C on the nozzle:

      ;calibrate_z_probe_offset.g
      G31 P100 X0 Y0 Z0			; Reset Z trigger height to 0mm
      M290 R0 S0				; Reset babystepping
      G29 S2					; Clear bed mesh
      G28					; Home the effector
      G1 X0 Y0 Z20 F6000			; Move close to the bed
      G30					; Probe to find a rough Z 0mm
      
      G1 X0 Y0 Z1 F3000			; Move the nozzle to Z 1mm slowly
      G92 Z3.0				; Set the Z height to 3mm, allowing moves below 0
      M291 P"Lower the nozzle to until it grips a piece of paper. Click to continue." S2 Z1
      G92 Z0					; Define this point as 0mm
      G1 X0 Y0 Z20				; Move the probe to Z 20mm
      G30 S-3					; Probe and set the trigger height
      G1 Z20					; Raise Z to 20mm
      

      It will report your trigger height back, which you can then put into config.g

      Carloundefined bbergerundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Carloundefined
        Carlo @NexxCat
        last edited by

        @NexxCat

        Thanks I'll try that right now.
        Really appreciated.

        Thanks C

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Carloundefined
          Carlo @NexxCat
          last edited by Carlo

          @NexxCat

          Hi,

          I ran the macro thanks for that results are:

          1st
          M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
          Z probe trigger height set to -0.084 mm

          2nd
          M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
          Z probe trigger height set to -0.146 mm

          3rd
          M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
          Z probe trigger height set to -0.159 mm

          4th
          M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
          Z probe trigger height set to -0.146 mm

          5th
          M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
          Z probe trigger height set to -0.159 mm

          6th
          M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
          Z probe trigger height set to -0.159 mm

          So not sure what to set it to ... I know -0.159 I thought 3 out of 6 gotta be the one ....Its not the one.

          after macro ztest.jpg

          Thanks for the help oops guys or Ladies really appreciated PC correction

          NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Phaedruxundefined
            Phaedrux Moderator
            last edited by

            I can't remember if this has been asked already, but has the bed been PID tuned?

            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

            Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Carloundefined
              Carlo @Phaedrux
              last edited by

              @Phaedrux

              Hiya,

              Yeah both H0/H1 have and they are in the config.
              I'm calling it now..... I'm done off to research a replacement.

              Really appreciate all the help from everyone big THANK YOU!

              droftartsundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • NexxCatundefined
                NexxCat @Carlo
                last edited by

                @Carlo
                Did you use a single sheet of paper when it asked, just regular printer paper? Alternatively, if you have some feeler gauges, you can use a 0.10mm gauge.

                Carloundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • droftartsundefined
                  droftarts administrators @Carlo
                  last edited by

                  @Carlo From my earlier post: When you swapped the original board back in, did you also put the original effector back on, or did it use the smart effector? If you used the original effector (and presumably original probe), can you try that with the Duet? This would at least narrow down if it's the effector or the Duet.

                  Ian

                  Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                  Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Carloundefined
                    Carlo @NexxCat
                    last edited by Carlo

                    @NexxCat

                    Hi NexxCat

                    I used the back off a sticker which is 0.1mm on my calipers.
                    Just found my gauges !

                    Thanks

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Carloundefined
                      Carlo @NexxCat
                      last edited by

                      @NexxCat

                      Hi,

                      So I used the well 0.102 feeler gauge though it is .10 with my calipers and 3 times got 3 heights.
                      I did video the whole process but that won't help me
                      The numbers don't actually help because they are not accurate though one of them is:

                      M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
                      Z probe trigger height set to -0.159 mm

                      I don't think it's the effector because it does what it is supposed to do and no matter what trigger height I put in G31 line its the same outcome and the effector does return the same probe heights all be it not one after the other 🙂
                      maybe the drivers are not calculating correctly I don't know but it is what it is and that is not usable.

                      Cheers for your help.

                      C

                      NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • NexxCatundefined
                        NexxCat @Carlo
                        last edited by

                        @Carlo
                        Ok, last thing I can think of, just to double check if the actual positioning is being repeatable. Run these commands one at a time, or save it as a macro:

                        ; Disable any baby-stepping and the bed mesh
                        M290 R0 S0
                        G29 S2
                        
                        ; Home the effector
                        G28
                        
                        ; Heat bed to 60C & nozzle to 130C
                        M104 S130 T0
                        M190 S60 T0
                        M109 S130 T0
                        
                        ; Run delta calibration
                        G32
                        
                        ; Move the effector to 0,0,Max height
                        G1 X0 Y0 F4500
                        G1 Z500 F4500
                        
                        ; Move the effector back to 10mm off the bed
                        G1 Z10 F4500
                        
                        ; Slowly move down to 0.1mm
                        G1 Z0.1 F600
                        

                        When the macro is finished, the nozzle is at 0.1 on the Z axis. Use the paper or a 0.1mm feeler gauge and see if the nozzle truly is at 0.1mm

                        Carloundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Carloundefined
                          Carlo @droftarts
                          last edited by Carlo

                          @droftarts

                          Hi Ian,

                          I used the original effector with the mag arms (printed the adapters) whats funny is I didn't even try to get anything level or square I literally slapped it together set the offset 1 level and it just worked.
                          I have the effector still wired I can carefully attach it to the Duet2 and try it i cant fit the effector to the other board it's locked down
                          but I've written this thing off now I don't expect this to ever work with duet but after spending all this time I do want to know whats wrong maybe it will help someone else some day...probably not

                          I post a video of it once its fitted

                          Thanks
                          C

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Carloundefined
                            Carlo @NexxCat
                            last edited by

                            @NexxCat

                            I'll do that now.

                            Cheers
                            C

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Carloundefined
                              Carlo @NexxCat
                              last edited by

                              @NexxCat

                              Hi NexxCat,

                              No its 0.1mm to high

                              NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • NexxCatundefined
                                NexxCat @Carlo
                                last edited by

                                @Carlo
                                What is your current Z probe offset?

                                Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Carloundefined
                                  Carlo @NexxCat
                                  last edited by

                                  @NexxCat

                                  G31 P100 X0 Y0 Z-0.159

                                  NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • NexxCatundefined
                                    NexxCat @Carlo
                                    last edited by

                                    @Carlo
                                    I can't remember offhand which way to adjust the offset to bring it closer, but try both of these, one will certainly be too high, but the other, does that give you a 0.1mm gap when running the macro I posted?

                                    G31 P100 X0 Y0 Z-0.059
                                    
                                    G31 P100 X0 Y0 Z-0.259
                                    
                                    Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • Carloundefined
                                      Carlo @NexxCat
                                      last edited by

                                      @NexxCat

                                      They have all been tried

                                      it's 0.05 to bring it closer dc42 suggested 0.05 so I've tried all the -0. possible infact the video I posted is -0.05

                                      NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • NexxCatundefined
                                        NexxCat @Carlo
                                        last edited by NexxCat

                                        @Carlo
                                        I know you've tried them whilst printing, but try -0.059 and run the macro. Is the gap 0.1mm?

                                        Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Carloundefined
                                          Carlo @NexxCat
                                          last edited by

                                          @NexxCat

                                          Doing it now

                                          Bang on

                                          NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • NexxCatundefined
                                            NexxCat @Carlo
                                            last edited by

                                            @Carlo
                                            So with -0.059, the gap is exactly 0.1mm after running the macro I posted. Correct?

                                            Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA